/
/
/
Adverse Possession Claims: Meeting the Evidential Burden

Adverse Possession Claims: Meeting the Evidential Burden

Adverse possession is a legal doctrine that enables a person who has occupied land for a prescribed period, without the permission of the legal owner, to apply to become the registered proprietor of that land. The concept is sometimes described as “squatters’ rights”; however, this terminology can be misleading. In practice, adverse possession is a complex area of law that is heavily dependent upon factual evidence. It is not simply a case of occupying land and asserting ownership over it.

Whether you are considering pursuing an adverse possession claim or responding to one, it is essential to understand the legal requirements that must be satisfied.

What Must Be Established for an Adverse Possession Claim?

To successfully establish a claim for adverse possession, an applicant must demonstrate:

  • That they have been in factual possession of the land for the required period (ten years for registered land and twelve years for unregistered land);
  • That they possessed the necessary intention to possess the land; and
  • That their possession was without the consent of the legal owner.

Whilst these requirements may appear straightforward, each involves a significant evidential burden.

Factual Possession in Adverse Possession Claims

Factual possession requires clear evidence of physical control over the land. The applicant must demonstrate that they have dealt with the land in a manner consistent with ownership and that their occupation would have been apparent to others.

Examples of conduct that may support a finding of factual possession include enclosing the land with fencing, carrying out maintenance or cultivation, excluding third parties, or making improvements to the land.

It is not necessary to reside on the land. However, it is necessary to show a sufficient degree of exclusive physical control.

Demonstrating an Intention to Possess the Land

Physical occupation alone is insufficient. The applicant must also demonstrate an intention to possess the land for their own benefit.

This does not require an intention to acquire legal ownership. Rather, it requires evidence that the applicant intended to exercise exclusive control over the land and to exclude all others, including the legal owner, so far as reasonably practicable.

Actions which may support the necessary intention include erecting signage, installing locked gates, restricting access, or otherwise taking active measures to control who may enter the land.

Possession Without the Owner’s Consent

The possession must be adverse, meaning it must have taken place without the legal owner’s permission. If occupation began with the owner’s consent, whether formal or informal, it will not usually support an adverse possession claim unless there is clear evidence that the occupation later became adverse.

Unless there is a clear point at which the occupation ceased to be permissive and became adverse, the claim may not succeed.

Why Evidence Matters in Adverse Possession Claims

The success or failure of an adverse possession claim will often depend upon the quality and reliability of the available evidence. It is necessary not only to establish the nature of the occupation but also to demonstrate that it continued for the relevant period and occurred without the owner’s consent.

Potentially useful evidence may include:

  • Dated photographs;
  • Records of maintenance, repairs, or improvements;
  • Utility bills or other documents demonstrating occupation;
  • Witness statements from neighbours or other third parties; and
  • Any additional documentation evidencing a consistent pattern of control and use.

It is important to note that any significant gaps, inconsistencies, or uncertainties in the evidence may substantially weaken a claim.

At Herrington Carmichael, we can guide you through the process, assess the strength of your position and help you put forward the strongest possible case. Our experienced Property Litigation solicitors regularly advise on adverse possession claims, boundary disputes and Land Registry applications. We can assist with gathering and presenting the necessary evidence, ensuring your application is prepared correctly from the outset and reducing the risk of refusal, which could result in a two-year wait before a further application can be made.

Whether you are considering making an adverse possession claim or responding to one, our Property Litigation team can provide clear, practical advice tailored to your circumstances. Contact us to discuss your situation and explore your options.

This reflects the law and market position at the date of publication and is written as a general guide. It does not contain definitive legal advice, which should be sought in relation to a specific matter.

Authors

Jed Temple PNG
Jed Temple
Senior Solicitor
0118 907 8392
jed.temple@hc.law
Chloe-Santer-PNG2
Chloe Santer
Solicitor
01276 740 837
chloe.santer@hc.law

Want to read more?

Explore our latest insights.

Related posts

Aerial top down view of a quiet residential neighborhood with detached houses, green gardens, private swimming pools and tree lined streets bordering a dark lake, showing suburban layout from above.
Adverse possession is a legal doctrine that enables a person who has occupied land for a prescribed period, without the…
August 30, 2021, Manchester, United Kingdom. The emblem of the Manchester City football club on the background of a modern stadium.
It has been reported that an independent commission has found Manchester City guilty on 114 of the 115 charges brought…
Retiring father and his smiling adult son jointly holding the finalized ownership transfer document for their family business.
Family businesses are often built over decades through hard work, careful planning and shared values. However, when succession plans fail,…