Solicitor, Family
Alexandra is a Solicitor in the Family department working across a full range of nuptial agreements and divorce and separation matters, including both children and finances.
She is developing a specialism in complex and innovative financial structures, such as business ownership, crypto- and digital currencies, and executive remuneration structures (e.g. RSUs, Stock Options).
Alexandra undertook her Training Contract with Herrington Carmichael, completing 21 months of 24 in the Family department before qualifying into the team in September 2026. She holds a Distinction in the LLM Legal Practice Course and a 2:1 LLB (Hons) in Law with Psychology, which has equipped her with strong technical legal skills and a deep understanding of the emotional dynamics involved in family disputes. During her Training Contract, she was awarded Best Trainee Competitor at the University of Law’s 2025 Legal Skills Triathlon.
She is committed to and prides herself on providing clear, strategic, and empathetic support to clients navigating difficult personal issues.
The Challenge: We acted for a senior executive at a multinational technology company earning in excess of £500,000 per annum, paid both in US dollars and British pounds, in complex financial remedy proceedings.
The case involved the treatment and valuation of our client’s executive share awards (RSUs and Share Options), protecting pre-marital pension contributions from sharing, disputes concerning the value of the former matrimonial home, competing assessments of mortgage capacity, arguments over the other party’s future earning capacity, and claims against our client for both child maintenance and spousal maintenance.
Our Approach: We provided detailed and clear remuneration disclosure, preparing comprehensive evidence and submissions on the correct treatment of those awards, successfully resisting attempts to treat the same funds as both capital available for division and income available for maintenance claims. We also advised on the treatment of a single pension fund into which there had been transfers-in of pre-acquired investments and notably the significantly increased value since the initial contributions were made, James v Seymour Child Maintenance calculations, property valuation issues, mortgage capacity and the parties’ respective future earning potential. We were able to narrow the issues in dispute and present a compelling case at private FDR, placing our client in a strong position to achieve a clean break settlement.
The Outcome: Our team secured a settlement at private FDR achieving our client’s main goal of an immediate clean break, and the transfer of the former matrimonial home to the wife, a modest lump sum payment, provision for the payment of private school fees for the parties’ children, and retention of our client’s pre-marital pension. The parties reached a comprehensive settlement which avoided the need for a contested final hearing and prevented further legal costs.
What the client said: “Thanks to you and Alexandra for all your help so far. You’ve been a great team.”
What our team said: The case demonstrates the firm’s expertise in resolving high-value financial remedy disputes involving executive multi-currency remuneration structures, as well as non-matrimonial pension and high net worth maintenance claims, while securing commercially pragmatic settlements that avoid the costs and uncertainty of trial.
The team: Sarah Speed and Alexandra Hawkes
The Challenge: We recently acted for a husband in financial remedy proceedings where one key point of contention was the value and nature of his cryptocurrency holdings. The wife raised significant concerns about the transparency and legitimacy of these digital assets, with her legal team insisting that a cryptocurrency expert be instructed. The proposed expert costs approached £10,000, and they argued that our client should bear this expense.
Our Approach: We robustly opposed this proposal, successfully demonstrating that such expert instruction was unnecessary in the circumstances. Our team prepared a clear and comprehensive statement explaining the history, current value, and accessibility of the cryptocurrency in question. This approach satisfied the judge that there were no hidden or undervalued assets.
The Outcome: Our strategic handling of the disclosure saved our client substantial expert fees and ensured a fairer financial outcome. The case highlights the importance of clear early disclosure and the court’s willingness to take a pragmatic approach to digital assets when properly evidenced.
What the client said: Thank you for all of your hard work and support on my case.
What our team said: This case highlighted the importance of clarity and precision when dealing with emerging asset types like cryptocurrency. By proactively addressing concerns and presenting transparent, well-evidenced disclosure, we avoided unnecessary expert costs and secured a fair outcome for our client. It’s a great example of how a focused, informed approach can cut through complexity
The team: Paul Wild and Alexandra Hawkes
The Challenge: We acted for a client based in another country who was seeking to enter into a prenuptial agreement with an international element. Jurisdictional issues meant that a straightforward “mirror” agreement could not be implemented, as the relevant overseas jurisdiction did not recognise certain legal concepts commonly used in English prenuptial agreements.
Our Approach: We worked closely with our client, the other party’s legal representatives and international counsel to navigate the differing legal systems and achieve a workable solution. Through detailed discussions with overseas lawyers, we examined the extent to which the proposed English agreement would be recognised abroad, identified the legal concepts that would not be upheld in the foreign jurisdiction, and adapted the drafting accordingly.
We also provided strategic advice to our client on the merits of jurisdiction shopping on the breakdown of the marriage, should this come to be relevant.
The Outcome: Following negotiations and amendments to the English draft agreement, both parties were satisfied with the final terms and proceeded to execute the prenuptial agreement. The matter was concluded efficiently, providing the parties with greater clarity and certainty regarding their financial arrangements in the event of a future separation.
What the client said: “thank you, the explanations you have given throughout the whole process have been very thorough and I’m grateful for your assistance on this… I do believe I’ve protected myself and my current assets as much as possible, which was my goal with this document.”
What our team said: This matter highlights the importance of obtaining specialist advice where there are likely to be at least 2 main family homes over multiple jurisdictions and where either one or both parties are seeking protection of assets in the event of future relationship breakdown. By working closely with overseas counsel, and with careful, precise drafting, we were able to adapt the agreement to reflect the realities of multiple legal systems, and provide our client with practical, strategic advice and the reassurance of a secure cross-border solution that our client was confident in.
The team: Sarah Speed and Alexandra Hawkes