Construction Disputes

Herrington Carmichael is a full service law firm offering legal advice to UK and international businesses as well as individuals and families.
/
/
/
Construction Disputes

Disputes frequently arise in construction projects and can be difficult and costly to navigate. Successfully resolving or avoiding disputes is crucial to concluding projects on time and within budget.

We act for Housebuilders, Landowners, main contractors, sub-contractors, funders and professional advisors on all types of disputes and disagreements arising out of the construction and building industry.

Whether you require an early assessment of your construction contract, to advise you on the merits of any potential claim or if you are on the receiving end of a construction claim, our experts will tailor their approach to suit your needs and aims.

We can help you with:

  • Payment disputes regarding construction contracts
  • LADs, late or defective construction work
  • Disputes relating to defective works/remedial works
  • Disputes relating to interim and final accounts, including extension of time and delay claims
  • Professional negligence claims against architects, construction companies and project managers
  • Retentions
  • Termination and/or variation of construction contracts
  • Reviewing construction contracts before entering into any agreements

Our team will deliver solutions in a clear, cost-effective, and strategic manner, always taking into account the wider commercial considerations which impact your business day to day.

Key contact

Stephen Baker PNG
Stephen Baker
Partner, Head of Dispute Resolution

What our clients say about us

Stephen Baker is exceptionally well-experienced, has a steadfast, logical mind, and an incredible ability to pinpoint real issues.

Very knowledgeable team, highly client-focused and with generally quick turnaround of any requests. Very professional approach and very open and honest with their respective areas of expertise.

Stephen conducted complex and challenging litigation and responded to the demands of a demanding client with great patience, determination, and tactical astuteness, while also developing a strong and positive relationship with the other members of the legal team, including counsel. He is a seasoned and highly skilled litigator.

From the first person I spoke to, then to all of the team, they were all polite, precise, and knew exactly what service I was going to need.

Jed was brilliant and really compassionate about my tough situation. He was calming and reassuring when I was quite stressed about my situation. This alone was a real quality that helped me out and one that made him stand out. The whole team was brilliant, very clear on what needed to be done and what the process would look like.

I have now met several partners across a number of disciplines and find them all most accommodating. Mostly, we deal with the litigation team, who are very good, provide sound advice (even when it is not what you want to hear), and are personable and professional. The conveyancing team is also very efficient and seems to look to reserve costs where they can, which is very impressive. HC's billing is also good, quick, and easy to understand.

I have done a lot personally and with my firm over the years with Ed Jones, who is especially effective and with whom we have had a number of wins. He is also a very effective mediator. Jed Temple too has provided excellent advice, and Michelle Lambeth has also been helpful and accommodating.

The whole team was brilliant. They were great at listening and understanding my problem, with the main thing being reassuring about my situation. They explained clearly the different approaches to take and what the outcomes could be.

Friendly service with a clear understanding of what services are involved in a complex legal environment.

We used Herrington Carmichael to assist with a neighbour dispute regarding trespassing. With Daniel’s support, we were able to achieve our desired outcome in a timely manner. Daniel was approachable, clear in his communication and instructions, and provided us with well-informed advice on the best options for resolution. All communication was transparent, and any costs incurred were clearly explained in advance before work was undertaken. We would not hesitate to use Herrington Carmichael again for any future legal services and would definitely recommend them to others.

Professional, informative and would recommend.

I cannot thank your dispute resolution team enough for all your help. Once again, it was a pleasure dealing with you and should we ever have the misfortune to have to use your services, I would be very confident making that choice.

Insights

Get valuable insights from our articles.

Nurses assisting elderly people at retirement home
HC successfully advised Kenmore Group on its acquisition of the business and assets comprising Hamilton Park Nursing Home from Sentimental…
Business partnership meeting in office
Herrington Carmichael successfully advised Cennox Group, a global group expanding its portfolio of innovative companies within the technology, security and…
Document management concept. Person use laptop to paperless online approval for business process workflow illustrating management approval and project approve concept.
When was the last time you, as a director or company secretary, reviewed your Company’s filings at Companies House? Under…

Meet our experts

Dedicated professionals ready to assist you.

Stephen Baker PNG
Partner, Head of Dispute Resolution
Edward Jones PNG
Partner
Mike Pollard PNG
Legal Director
ben millward
Legal Director
Jed Temple PNG
Senior Solicitor
Oliver Williams PNG
Solicitor
Florrie-Aylward-PNG
Solicitor
Chloe-Santer-PNG2
Solicitor
ben porter
Paralegal

Frequently Asked Questions

Find answers to your most pressing questions about our services and processes.

It is a common misunderstanding that a contract must be on paper and signed between the parties to be binding. An unsigned contract or the absence of a contract completely does not mean that there is no contract in place and that the parties are potentially bound by what was agreed upon by the parties. A written contract provides better evidence of the parties’ agreement, but contractual obligations can arise in other ways. If you require any advice on whether you have a contract or wish to claim against a party when there is or is not a formal contract in place, we would be happy to assist you.

What constitutes a construction contract may surprise many, as there are numerous contracts which may not be an obvious construction contract but will be classed as one.

The definition of a construction contract is contained in section 104 of the Construction Act and states that a construction contract is “an agreement with a person for any of the following:

  • The carrying out of construction operations
  • Arranging for the carrying out of construction operations by others, and
  • Providing labour, or the labour of others, to carry out construction operations”.

Whilst this may appear to be an easy application, this definition can also include architectural, design or surveying work. It also applies to contracts involving engineering, decoration, and landscaping works.

The Construction Act goes further to define what “construction operations” (as set out in section 104 above) are. Section 105 of the Construction Act provides a rather wide definition of “construction operations” which includes:

  • The construction, alteration, repair, maintenance and demolition of buildings and structures.
  • This is not limited to buildings but also includes works which form part of the land, such as walls, roads, power lines, phone masts, runways, docks, harbours, industrial plants, land drainage and coastal protection.
  • Internal works such as the fit out, installation of heating, mechanical and electrical systems, fire protection, security, and communications systems.
  • The definition of a construction contract under the Construction Act even goes so far as to include cleaning (in the context of construction), decoration, painting, excavation works and site clearance.

It is worth noting that there are some contracts which are expressly excluded, such as:

  • Those which include drilling for or extraction of oil/gas, extraction of minerals, some works where the purpose is to assist in nuclear processing, power generation, water effluent and the production/processing or storage of chemicals, pharmaceuticals, oil, gas, steel or food and drink
  • Contracts for residential occupiers, e.g., a house extension where the homeowner occupies the main house
  • Contracts lasting less than 45 days

Since 2009, the requirement for a construction contract to be in writing has been removed, provided all other requirements under the Construction Act were met. However, a written contract is always preferable. A written contract gives the parties more certainty on the terms which govern their relationship. It is also common for parties to discover that their position differs on certain issues, and the negotiation of the contract terms helps to minimise the possibility of a future dispute.

It is important to understand your legal position under the contract.

What happens if you incorrectly assume you have a construction contract? This means that the statutory protections do not apply to you. As an example, parties only have a mandatory right to adjudicate if the relevant contract is a ‘construction contract’. If a party starts the adjudication process and the relevant contract is not a ‘construction contract’, this means that the other side could contest the adjudicator’s right to determine the underlying issues and the dispute itself.

What happens if you incorrectly assume you do not have a construction contract? Payment disputes are probably the most common type of dispute in the construction industry. Parties therefore need to understand their obligations and rights relating to payment dates, Payment Notices, and Pay Less Notices. Falling foul of any obligation imposed by the contract or the Construction Act can have severe legal and financial consequences.

Many disputes have arisen because one or both parties did not fully appreciate the applicability of the Construction Act to their contract.

These are a suite of “off the shelf” contracts which have been created and approved by the Joint Contracts Tribunal for use in the construction industry. These contracts can save time and minimise cost when looking to enter into a construction contract; however, when looking for flexibility and a more unique contract, these will not be appropriate. We would be pleased to advise you on the appropriate contract for your project and what the terms of any particular JCT contract mean.

Construction disputes are dealt with by the Technology and Construction Court (TCC). Adjudication, arbitration and mediation are other forms of dispute resolution processes in the construction industry. We would be pleased to advise you on any dispute you may have in the construction field.