Redundancy

Strategic, compliant support through workforce change and redundancy.

Redundancy is a legally defined form of dismissal that must be handled carefully to avoid unfair dismissal, discrimination and protective award claims. Employers must establish a genuine redundancy situation and follow a fair and transparent process, including consultation, fair selection and consideration of alternative employment. Redundancy processes are under increasing scrutiny following recent case law and reforms introduced by the Employment Rights Act 2025. We advise employers at all stages of workforce restructuring, helping to manage legal risk while maintaining employee relations and operational continuity.

This service supports employers of all sizes undertaking restructures, downsizing or organisational change.

We advise on whether a redundancy situation exists under the statutory definition, including business closure, workplace closure or reduced requirements for work of a particular kind. We support employers in documenting the commercial rationale and considering alternatives to redundancy.

 

We advise on fair consultation processes, selection pools and objective criteria. Where collective redundancy thresholds are met, we guide employers through representative elections and statutory consultation requirements. We also advise on suitable alternative employment and trial periods.

 

We support employers with redundancy documentation, including consultation letters, scripts and decision records. We also advise on governance frameworks and provide training for managers on conducting redundancy processes consistently and lawfully.

 

Where disputes arise, we advise on settlement strategies and defend Employment Tribunal claims, including unfair dismissal, discrimination and protective award claims.

Key contact

Alistair McArthur PNG
Alistair McArthur
Partner, Head of Employment

Insights

Get valuable insights from our articles.

Podcasts_Logo

All in a Day’s Work- Prevention of Sexual Harassment: From Awareness to Action

In this episode of All in a Day’s Work on The Legal Room UK podcast, Alex Harper is joined by…
Business people having meeting at the boardroom

When Good Policies Are Not Enough: Lessons from the Treasury Inquest

A recent inquest into the death of a Treasury employee has prompted renewed discussion about workplace investigations, employee wellbeing and…
Shocked female employee look amazed peeping at coworker laptop

It’s Not the Second Job That Gets You Fired

A recent decision of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) serves as an important reminder that while employees having second jobs…

Meet our experts

Dedicated professionals ready to assist you.

Alistair McArthur PNG
Alistair McArthur
Partner, Head of Employment
Darren-Smith
Darren Smith
Partner
Matt Jenkin PNG
Matt Jenkin
Partner
Hannah King PNG
Hannah King
Legal Director
Alex-Harper-PNG
Alex Harper
Senior Solicitor
Sam Gray PNG
Samuel Gray
Senior Solicitor
Tom-Hyatt-PNG
Tom Hyatt
Senior Solicitor
Cassie Blackledge PNG
Cassie Blackledge
Solicitor
mellisa v2
Victoria Wootton
Solicitor
mellisa v2
Katherine Bridge
Solicitor
mellisa v2
Isabella Milnes-James
Solicitor
Maryam Nackvi PNG
Maryam Nackvi
Solicitor
Jo Boxhall PNG
Jo Boxhall
Solicitor

Frequently Asked Questions

Find answers to your most pressing questions about our services and processes.

Recent appellate guidance and legislative reform have heightened expectations around consultation quality, transparency and decision making in redundancy exercises. Failures in process, even where the underlying business rationale is sound, are increasingly being challenged.

A redundancy situation arises where an employer closes its business, closes a workplace or has a reduced requirement for employees to carry out work of a particular kind. Redundancy is a statutory concept and should not be used to address conduct or capability issues.

The primary risks include unfair dismissal claims, discrimination claims and protective awards for failure to consult collectively. Compensation exposure can be significant, particularly where group claims are brought, and mishandling redundancies can also damage morale and reputation.

Yes. Consultation must be meaningful and take place before decisions are finalised. Employers must explain proposals, listen to feedback and consider alternatives. Failure to do so is a common basis for successful claims.

Collective consultation is required where 20 or more redundancies are proposed within a 90 day period at a single establishment. This triggers obligations to consult employee representatives and comply with statutory minimum consultation periods.

Selection pools should include employees doing the same or interchangeable work. Selection criteria must be objective, measurable and consistently applied. Care is needed to avoid criteria that could be directly or indirectly discriminatory.

Yes. Employers must actively consider whether suitable alternative employment exists anywhere within the organisation throughout the redundancy process. A failure to do so is a common feature of successful unfair dismissal claims.

Yes. If redundancy selection or criteria disadvantage employees with protected characteristics, employers may face discrimination claims in addition to unfair dismissal claims. Discrimination compensation is uncapped.

Confirm the business rationale, explore alternatives to redundancy and plan consultation carefully. Taking early legal advice can significantly reduce risk and help structure a fair and defensible process.

Still have questions?

We’re here to help you.